Latest News and Events
PRESS RELEASE - January 2005
Crucial matter of valve selection
Crucial
matter of valve selection Bestobell argues that the selection
of valves in LNG carrier sampling and purging applications
is in need of a new approach, especially in view of the rapidly
changing nature of LNG shipping By Andrew C Brown, Director,
Bestobell LNG Kevin Fretwell, Technical Director, Bestobell
LNG Ian Morris, Product Development Manager, Bestobell LNG
Frances Crosland, Project Manager, Bestobell LNG The LNG carrier
fleet is set to more than double in a few years and each new
ship will be expected to operate at a level of efficiency
unheard of until recently.
The choice of the wrong valve technology will severely compromise
this goal of high operating efficiency. The installation of
unsuitable valves carries with it a high risk of leaks, expensive
valve maintenance and safety concerns during the lifetime
of the ship. The specific issue considered here is the design
of LNG valves used in sampling and purging applications. Because
the advent of larger size LNG carriers has introduced much
bigger ship design variations, it is more importance than
ever that the correct cryogenic valve technology is selected.
Why are ball valves currently specified for sampling and purging
on LNG carriers? Over 30 years ago, when the LNG industry
was young, naval artchitects and marine engineers looked to
the more established very large crude carrier (VLCC) designs
to provide a lead on the choice of valves. VLCCs had relied
successfully on ball valves to manage the flow of oil around
shipboard cargo systems, distribution manifolds and shoreside
terminals. As a result, the same valve technology was applied
to the new breed of LNG carriers emerging in the 1960s and
1970s.
No apparent consideration was given to the difference in performance
of such valves when handling very cold liquefied natural gas.
The only criterion was that the valves supplied were fire-safe.
LNG carrier design is a relatively conservative discipline.
It has changed little over the last 40 years, including in
the area of valve technology. As a result, the use of ball
valves is still the norm. In the meantime, the general cryogenics
industry has adopted globe valves for the storage of cryogenic
liquids, including LNG. Bestobell considers LNG carriers to
be, effectively, temporary cryogenic storage facilities.
Cryogenic liquids, including LNG, have a completely different
performance profile to that of oil when handled in bulk. Bestobell
would never specify ball valves in leakage-critical cryogenic
storage applications, for a number of reasons. Ball valves
are mainly specified in process applications where pressure
and flow are critical. They are designed to remain permanently
open, hence the size of the orifice of the ball is the same
diameter as the pipe. A ball valve will only be operated in
a shutdown or bypass situation. In the 1960s an operator handling
cryogenic liquids was involved in a major accident when a
sampling valve was fully opened.
The valve in question was a ball valve, and the subsequent
enquiry established that the accident was due to the specification
of that valve. As a result of the lessons learned, some ship
operators have since employed cryogenic globe valves in their
sampling and purging lines and for other applications requiring
tight shut-off. In industrial cryogenic applications globe
valves are favoured for sampling and purging applications
because of the level of control they offer, i.e. they enable
the operator to control and throttle the flow and pressure
during these operations.
Advances in design technology over the years have resulted
in modern globe valves with greater safety margins than their
predecessors. For example, the anti-blowout stem retention
system, which nullifies what was once a weakness of the globe
valve, is now a common feature on such devices. In addition,
the round bonnet with the slip-on flange not only facilitates
installation in areas of limited accessibility but also, more
importantly, provides an antidote to the thermal contraction
and expansion of the seals that occur at very low temperatures.
The arrangement thus ensures a long service life for the unit.
The use of conventional bonnet designs in such applications
would result in leakage over time.
Both ball valves and valves fitted with a bonnet welded to
the stem become distorted around the seal face over time,
resulting in leakage. Of the benefits delivered by globe valve
technology, none is more important than longevity. Despite
the extremes of operation, there are still cryogenic globe
valves in regular use that have provided safe service in over
40 years of continuous operation. The same cannot be said
of a ball valve in cryogenic service. While the majority of
LNG carriers still employ ball valves in their sampling and
purging lines, if shipowners were to utilise the latest risk
assessment techniques as a basis for their decisions, the
dangers of choosing ball valves would be highlighted.
These risk assessment techniques would make use of the expertise
accumulated by cryogenic valve manufacturers over many years
in their work to develop products able to perform maintenance-free
over the longest periods practicable. Such development work
entails researching the performance of materials under huge
temperature variations; studying flow characteristics; measuring
operational wear and tear; and creating the appropriate technological
solutions. Our own research and development work has proven
the advantages of globe valves over ball valves for sampling
and purging.
These advantages include lighter mass, lower cost, reduced
risk of leaks, low maintenance and improved safety. Not all
globe valves are the same. Rising costs and other commercial
considerations have prompted certain manufacturers to introduce
globe valves whose design does not take adequate account of
the cryogenic environment. Based on non-cryogenic designs,
such globe valves do not allow for thermal expansion and contraction
in the body design and are also susceptible to liquid lock,
a major safety concern.
In summary, when choosing a valve for sampling and purging
on LNG carriers, such a valve needs to possess the following
characteristics: - cryogenic suitability - ability to throttle
the liquid flow for increased control and safety - a full-bore
design - zero leakage design - a loose bonnet construction
to allow thermal expansion and contraction to occur without
disrupting the seal between the body and the headwork - increased
sealing area with protection from particle ingress - fire-safe
approved to BS 6755 Part 2 and BS EN ISO 10497:2004 - revolving
disc to ensure non-rotating seat contact. - metal to metal
seat to ensure tight shut-off at all times - a one-piece,
anti-blowout spindle manufactured to a high-strength design
especially for LNG service It is incumbant upon the valve
manufacturer to educate the market on the selection of the
correct valves for particular applications.
In addition, it is the responsibility of shipowners and shipbuilders
to ensure that the correct product is specified and that the
future of liquefied gas transport is not compromised by unnecessary
risks.